The rings of influence

In the complex landscape of project management and organizational development, identifying and understanding stakeholders is crucial. The 'rings of influence' provide a framework to classify the different levels of involvement and influence that stakeholders have on projects or decisions.

This article delves deep into the matter, explains the roles within these rings and indicates how to apply this concept in a stakeholder analysis.

What do the rings affect?

Rings of influence refer to a model that classifies stakeholders around a project or decision based on their level of involvement and influence. This model helps to visually organize stakeholders, so that it becomes clear who has what interests. And how best to approach these people or groups.

Rolling inside the rings

Decision maker

This role has direct influence on decisions. Decision makers are often senior management members or project leaders who are ultimately responsible for the outcomes.

User

Users are directly dependent on the results or products that emerge from a project. Their feedback is essential for successful implementation.

Executor

Those who actually get to work implementing or executing tasks within a project fall under this category. They need practical knowledge about what needs to be done.

Suppliers

Suppliers provide the resources, such as materials, software or expertise, necessary to complete a project. Their input is crucial in the planning phase.

Level of commitment

Participate in decision-making

Stakeholders with this level of involvement have a say in important decisions.

To cooperate

This group actively helps to achieve objectives by carrying out tasks.

Think along

This includes people who advise and provide feedback, but have no direct responsibility for implementation.

Participate

In some cases it is important that certain people are and remain informed, even if they do not have an active role in the process.

The use of the rings of influence in a stakeholder analysis?

A stakeholder analysis using the rings of influence starts with identifying who the stakeholders are. You then classify each stakeholder according to their respective role as decision maker, user, etc. And what level of involvement there is, from co-decision to knowledge.

1. Set goals

Start with clear objectives for your stakeholder analysis, know what you want to achieve.

2. Make an overview of all stakeholders

Make a list of all possible individuals, groups and organizations involved in the project.

3. Categorize by roles and involvement

Once you have identified all stakeholders, divide them into groups based on their role and type of involvement.

4. Analyze influence and relationships

Investigate how these stakeholders influence each other and can contribute to the project.

5. Prioritize actions

Based on the depth of analysis, you can now develop strategies to deal with different stakeholders. Effectively managing stakeholders requires a careful balance between requirements, wishes and expectations of all parties involved.

A well-executed stakeholder analysis using the rings of influence will help you find that balance and bring your project or initiative to a successful conclusion.

Benefits of the rings of influence in a stakeholder analysis

The rings of influence model provides a visual way to classify stakeholders according to their level of importance and influence. This can be extremely beneficial for the efficiency and effectiveness of the stakeholder management process.

1. Setting clear priorities

By placing stakeholders in different rings based on their relevance to the project, it quickly becomes clear which groups deserve priority. This ensures that you use the available time and resources in a targeted manner.

2. Facilitates communication planning

The model helps plan tailor-made communication strategies for each group of stakeholders. By recognizing that not all parties need the same level of information or interaction, you are able to communicate more effectively.

3. Flexibility with changes

Using the rings allows you to easily make adjustments when the influence or interests of stakeholders change during the life cycle of a project. This ensures dynamic stakeholder management that adapts to new developments.

Disadvantages of the rings of influence in a stakeholder analysis

Despite the advantages, there are also disadvantages to this model. It is important to consider these critically when applying them.

1. Risk of simplification

Classifying stakeholders within fixed rings can lead to oversimplification. Interests and influences are often more complex than a one-dimensional classification can show, resulting in a loss of nuance.

2. Potential neglect of less influential stakeholders

There is a risk that stakeholders with less direct influence or power are ignored, while they may have a significant impact in the longer term or indirectly. It is crucial not to overlook important perspectives.

3. Danger of rigidity in approach

Once divided into specific rings, you may be inclined to view this division as static. This may make you less alert to shifts in interests and distributions of power that take place during the process.

Also read all about it stakeholder management and the stakeholder salience model.

Conclusion

A stakeholder analysis is essential for successful management and implementation of projects. By using the rings of influence as a tool for your stakeholder analysis, you gain insight into who has the most influence and impact on your project.

Continue to continuously monitor whether there is a shift in the interests or needs of your stakeholders and make adjustments where necessary.

Also read: What is the Factor C communication method?

Need help with your communication strategy?

Developing a good communication strategy does not happen overnight and can be a challenging task. Do you need help putting these tips into practice?

Then take Contact contact us, we are happy to help you!

Glossary